Date: 19990528 From: Declan Moriarty <genius@esatclear.ie> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Inductance testingI very occasionally want to find the value of an inductor. This does not justify the purchase of dedicated space consuming equipment. I'd like to make a simple circuit to allow for an educated guess to the nearest value, maybe even using a 'scope or frequency meter. Any suggestions or urls?
Date: 19990528 From: Clint Hamilton <orpheusaudiovideo@home.com> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Re: Inductance testingInductance meters are very cheap. I have one I got from Parts Express that is a capacitance meter, and checks ohms, hfe on xistors, diodes, and inductance. Costs about 85 bucks US. There are many out there a little cheaper and for a whole lot more too. www.partsexpress.com
Date: 19990528 From: John E Freeman <edfree@concentric.net> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Re: Inductance testingDeclan Moriarty wrote:
I very occasionally want to find the value of an inductor. This does not justify the purchase of dedicated space consuming equipment. I'd like to make a simple circuit to allow for an educated guess to the nearest value, maybe even using a 'scope or frequency meter. Any suggestions or urls?This may work, don't know for shure though. Lets say that the inductor is fairly large so we will use 60(50) Hz line frequency as a standard. Using a filament type transformer with a safe secondary voltage of 6-24 RMS volts, place in series to the secondary a resistor and the inductor in question (the resistor should be great enough to limit the current to a safe value) Measure the voltage drop across the resistor, then calculate, using Ohms law the RMS current, then measure the voltage across the inductor and calculate, using Ohms law and the RMS current, the effective impedence, now with the frequency and impedence known you should be able to determine the inductance. for smaller inductors a higher frequency (must be a known frequency) will be needed.
Date: 19990528 From: Bob Gordon <kb2zgn@mindspring.com> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Re: Inductance testingIf you have a function generator, you have all you need to determine the value of any inductor when used in conjunction with the o'scope and frequency counter/meter. The added benefit is that you can also get the Q of the inductor as well with that set-up.
Date: 19990528 From: Bob Gordon <kb2zgn@mindspring.com> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Re: Inductance testing
This may work, don't know for shure though. Lets say that the inductor is fairly large so we will use 60(50) Hz line frequency as a standard. Using a filament type transformer with a safe secondary voltage of 6-24 RMS volts, place in series to the secondary a resistor and the inductor in question (the resistor should be great enough to limit the current to a safe value) Measure the voltage drop across the resistor, then calculate, using Ohms law the RMS current, then measure the voltage across the inductor and calculate, using Ohms law and the RMS current, the effective impedence, now with the frequency and impedence known you should be able to determine the inductance. for smaller inductors a higher frequency (must be a known frequency) will be needed.I'm afraid that this method will not work. The impedance of an inductor is not directly proportional to the frequency of the voltage applied, otherwise this would be a valid test. An inductors impedence is at it's lowest at a frequency (resonant) determined by several factors including wire size, coil diameter, and core material and is not linear over a wide frequency range. The "Q" or bandwidth is determined by finding the points on either side of the peak frequency where the loss reaches the 3db point and varies widely depending on the construction of the coil. This can be easily plotted using a function generator or signal generator, o'scope, and to make frequency measurement simpler, a frequency counter. Frequency can be determined from the scope display, but it is not as precise and assumes that the scope is calibrated. With the advent of cheap inductance meters available, this procedure is time consuming and the only benefit is in finding the natural "Q" of the inductor. Save yourself a load of work and get an inexpensive inductance meter. They have the generator, counter and can calculate the inductance instantly. The time alone that it saves will pay for itself.
Let me know if this works.
Date: 19990528 From: Andrew Ingraham <Andrew.Ingraham@compaq.com> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: RE: Inductance testingOf the three basic passive electrical components (resistors, capacitors, inductors), inductors are the least ideal.
Date: 19990528 From: Kerry Berland <kerry@siliconengines-ltd.com> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Re: Inductance testingI'm sure you'll get some excellent suggestions on a roll-your-own approach. But we use a Wavetek DM27XT multimeter. In addition to the usual-- volts, ohms, amps--it also measures capacitance and inductance. Takes very little space, and not much more money than a standard multimeter.
Date: 19990528 From: Logger <wireline@mindspring.com> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Re: Inductance testingWe use the same meter and like it alot.
Date: 19990531 From: Herne Renaud <Renaud.Herne@UCB-Group.com> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: RE: Inductance testing
What about building an LC oscillator?
This circuit has an unique resonance frequency.
So it will oscillate with a frequency related to L and C.
C is known or can be measured easily
(by measuring this way a known inductance ie: calibrate).
The problem is resumed to a frequency measurement.
The correct frequency is automatically selected provided.
the feedback amplifier of the oscillator has sufficient bandwidth.
The advantage of the frequency measurment is that
it has a very wide dynamic response (1Hz-10MHz is common)
I think that this method of measurement should work
... but I never tryed.
Any comments?
Date: 19990531 From: Declan Moriarty <genius@esatclear.ie> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: RE: Inductance testingOn Fri, 28 May 1999, you informed me:
Of the three basic passive electrical components (resistors, capacitors, inductors), inductors are the least ideal.Can I refine my query? I am amazed by the huge response, and thanks to you all. I do not have a function generator - I do have an RF generator (valve operated Heathkit ;-).
They tend to have sizable parasitic components (series resistance, shunt capacitance). Their electrical characteristics may depend more on those parasitics than on the inductance, over wide frequency ranges. That makes measuring their inductance more difficult; you need to find the right frequency range (for each type of inductor) where you are actually able to see and measure the inductance. Too low a frequency, and DC resistance swamps it. Too high, and you're above resonance where capacitance dominates; or you may be into a region of second-order effects, like lead inductance which could be a lot smaller than the low frequency inductance. The "right" frequency range depends greatly on the inductor model ... or on what frequency range is of interest to you.
Many inductors also are very nonlinear in the sense that inductance varies greatly (orders of magnitude) versus DC current. Also they are affected by placement, nearby iron, nearby planes, wires, etc.
So take any inductance measurement with a few grains of salt.
Date: 19990601 From: Andrew Ingraham <Andrew.Ingraham@compaq.com> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: RE: Inductance testing
What about building an LC oscillator?A possible problem is that the real circuit DOESN'T have an unique resonance frequency, due to all the parasitic effects I've mentioned. If your amplifier has enough gain at high frequencies, it is possible to excite one of those modes rather than the primary parallel resonance. I don't know how often this happens, but it is a potential pitfall.
This circuit has an unique resonance frequency.
Date: 19990606 From: Declan Moriarty <genius@esatclear.ie> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Inductance Testing NotionI have submitted a file called induct1.gif. Those interested can collect it. It contains my notion on Inductance Testing which I threatened you all with last week. This is part circuit, part block diagram, part omitted. Here is a decscription: (Fairly boring for everyone else :-)
Date: 19990607 From: Radek Soltys <rspublic@friko6.onet.pl> To: Multiple recipients of Chipdir Mailing List Subject: Re: Inductance testing
I very occasionally want to find the value of an inductor. This does not justify the purchase of dedicated space consuming equipment. I'd like to make a simple circuit to allow for an educated guess to the nearest value, maybe even using a 'scope or frequency meter. Any suggestions or urls?Here's a simple circuit that should allow you inductance approximate recognition. I haven't tested it yet, but it is very simple, thus worth trying. If you have any questions about its operation or assembly - contact me personally and I'll refer to the Polish article where I found the schematic.
Goto: | Main | Mirror | About | Author |
Register: | Yourself | Company | ||
Feedback: | Correction | Addition | Question | |
Request quote: | Chips (Deutsch) | Chips (English) | Chips (Nederlands) |